Why Metrics Matter in Agile
The right metrics illuminate problems before they become crises. They help teams make data-driven decisions about process improvements, capacity planning, and technical debt.
But here's the trap: metrics without context become targets. When teams optimize for metrics instead of outcomes, those metrics stop being useful. This guide shows you which metrics to track—and how to use them without gaming the system.
The 4 Core Metrics
Velocity
Per Sprint
Amount of work completed per sprint. Use for capacity planning, not performance evaluation.
Lead Time
Per Story
Total time from story creation to production deployment. Measures end-to-end delivery speed.
Cycle Time
Per Story
Active work time only. Lower cycle time = faster delivery and better flow.
Throughput
Per Sprint
Number of items shipped. More valuable than velocity for measuring delivery cadence.
Vanity Metrics to Avoid
Code Coverage %
high RiskWhy it's bad: High coverage doesn't equal good tests. Teams game this by writing assertion-free tests.
Track this instead: Defect escape rate and production incidents per release
Story Points per Developer
high RiskWhy it's bad: Encourages point inflation and individual competition instead of team collaboration.
Track this instead: Team velocity trends and sprint goal completion rate
Hours Logged
medium RiskWhy it's bad: Measures presence, not output. Penalizes efficient work and rewards busywork.
Track this instead: Value delivered to customers (revenue, engagement, satisfaction)
Lines of Code
medium RiskWhy it's bad: Rewards verbosity. Good code is often shorter, not longer.
Track this instead: Code review feedback quality and refactoring frequency
Sprint Commitment Rate
low RiskWhy it's bad: Teams will sandbag estimates to guarantee 100% completion every sprint.
Track this instead: Value delivered and customer satisfaction scores
How to Use Metrics Without Gaming Them
!Point Inflation
What happens: Teams gradually inflate estimates so a "5" becomes an "8" for the same work.
How to detect: Velocity rising while throughput stays flat. Story complexity not actually increasing.
Prevention: Use reference stories as anchors. Track throughput alongside velocity. Make gaming visible.
!Cherry-Picking Stories
What happens: Developers avoid high-uncertainty stories to maintain predictable metrics.
How to detect: Technical debt and exploratory work consistently deprioritized. "Easy wins" prioritized.
Prevention: Reserve sprint capacity for unknowns. Celebrate learning, not just velocity.
!Counting Incomplete Work
What happens: Giving partial credit for "90% done" stories to inflate velocity.
How to detect: High velocity but low deployment rate. Stories linger in review or QA.
Prevention: Only count fully deployed stories. Binary done/not-done tracking.
!Optimizing for Metrics, Not Outcomes
What happens: Building features that boost metrics but don't deliver customer value.
How to detect: Metrics improving but customer satisfaction/revenue flat or declining.
Prevention: Tie metrics to business outcomes. Review impact alongside output.
Golden Rules for Healthy Metrics
- Never use metrics for individual performance reviews
- Track trends over time, not single sprint snapshots
- Combine multiple metrics to get the full picture
- Make metrics visible to the team, not management dashboards
- Focus on improvement, not hitting arbitrary targets
Connecting Estimation Accuracy to Metrics
Good estimation directly impacts metric reliability. If your estimates are wildly inaccurate, velocity becomes useless for planning. Track these to improve estimation quality:
Estimation Accuracy
Below 0.8 = over-estimating. Above 1.2 = under-estimating.
Variance Rate
High variance = unpredictable sprint outcomes, needs story breakdown.
Re-estimation Frequency
Frequent re-estimation signals unclear requirements or poor DoD.
Building Your Metrics Dashboard
The best dashboards are simple, visual, and team-facing. Here's a recommended layout that balances strategic and tactical metrics:
Velocity Trend
Cycle Time Distribution
Throughput
Lead Time (P50/P90)
Sprint Goal Success %
WIP Limits Status
Estimation Accuracy
💡 Pro Tip: Display this on a team monitor. Update daily during standup. Use it for retrospective discussions.
Good Metrics vs Bad Metrics
✓Good Metrics
- Actionable: Can be improved through team action
- Leading: Predict future problems before they happen
- Team-owned: Controlled by the team, not external factors
- Contextual: Compared to team history, not other teams
- Outcome-focused: Tied to customer or business value
✗Bad Metrics
- Vanity: Look good but don't drive improvement
- Lagging: Tell you about problems after it's too late
- Easily gamed: Can be manipulated without real improvement
- Competitive: Used to compare teams against each other
- Output-focused: Measure activity instead of outcomes
✓ Key Takeaways
- 1Track velocity, lead time, cycle time, and throughput—these four metrics tell you everything about delivery health.
- 2Avoid vanity metrics like code coverage %, individual story points, and hours logged—they encourage gaming.
- 3Never use metrics for performance reviews. Use them for team improvement and process optimization.
- 4Combine multiple metrics to prevent gaming. A single metric can always be manipulated.
- 5Good estimation accuracy (±20%) makes your metrics reliable. Bad estimates corrupt all downstream metrics.
Better Estimation = Better Metrics
Start tracking velocity and improve your team's estimation accuracy with our free planning poker tool.
Create Free Planning Poker Room